Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275 Specification

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275: A Retrospective: Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Lte S7275 Specification

Samsung galaxy ace 3 lte s7275 specification – The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275, released in 2013, represented Samsung’s attempt to offer a budget-friendly smartphone with 4G LTE connectivity. This review examines its specifications, user experience, and lasting impact within the broader context of Samsung’s mobile device history.

Device Overview

The Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275 targeted budget-conscious consumers seeking a device with access to faster 4G LTE networks. Its key selling points at launch included its affordable price, LTE connectivity (a relatively new feature at the time for budget phones), and familiar Samsung TouchWiz interface. Within Samsung’s product lineup, it occupied a lower-midrange position, sitting below more premium offerings like the Galaxy S series but above entry-level devices.

Technical Specifications, Samsung galaxy ace 3 lte s7275 specification

The following table details the key specifications of the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275:

Processor	RAM	Storage	Display
1.2 GHz dual-core processor (typically a Qualcomm Snapdragon or similar)	1 GB	8 GB (expandable via microSD)	4.0 inches, WVGA (800 x 480 pixels)
Operating System	Camera (Front & Rear)	Battery Capacity	Connectivity
Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean), with potential updates to 4.4 (KitKat) depending on region and carrier	5 MP rear, VGA front	1500 mAh	LTE, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0

The dual-core processor, while modest by today’s standards, provided acceptable performance for basic tasks in 2013. Benchmarks would have placed it below contemporary flagship devices but comparable to other budget smartphones of the era. The limited RAM (1GB) would have become a bottleneck for multitasking as apps became more demanding.

Considering its price point and release date, the strengths lay in its LTE connectivity and the familiar Samsung user interface. The weaknesses were the relatively low resolution display and limited RAM, which impacted performance, especially with more demanding apps.

User Experience

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275 offered a typical Samsung TouchWiz experience, known for its customization options and widget support. Everyday tasks like browsing, messaging, and light gaming were generally handled adequately, though performance could lag under heavier loads. Compared to other similar smartphones of the time, it provided a competitive experience, especially considering its price. However, it lacked the fluidity and responsiveness of higher-end devices.

Software and Updates

The device initially launched with Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean). Software updates varied by region and carrier, but many users received updates to Android 4.4 (KitKat). The impact of these updates was generally positive, improving performance and security. Significant software features included TouchWiz customizations, Samsung’s app ecosystem, and standard Android features for that version.

• TouchWiz customization options provided a degree of personalization.
• Access to the Google Play Store allowed for app installation and expansion of device functionality.
• Standard Android 4.2 features provided a familiar operating experience.

Design and Build Quality

The Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275 featured a typical Samsung design of the era—a plastic unibody construction. It shared design elements with other Samsung phones released around the same time, such as a relatively compact form factor and a physical home button. The materials were relatively durable for everyday use, although the plastic construction was susceptible to scratches and damage with prolonged use.

Camera Capabilities

The 5MP rear camera offered acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. Images generally possessed decent clarity and color accuracy. However, in low-light situations, noise levels increased significantly, impacting image quality. The VGA front camera was basic and only suitable for simple video calls. Compared to other devices in its class, the camera performance was average; neither exceptional nor significantly lacking.

Battery Life and Performance

The 1500 mAh battery provided a reasonable battery life under moderate usage. Screen brightness and app usage significantly impacted battery performance. Heavy gaming or continuous video streaming would drain the battery more quickly. Compared to a modern smartphone with similar specifications, the battery life would likely be considerably shorter, reflecting advancements in battery technology and power efficiency in more recent devices.

A hypothetical comparison would show a significant difference in usage time, possibly by several hours.

Legacy and Impact

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275 holds a place in Samsung’s history as a representative of their efforts to bring affordable 4G LTE connectivity to a wider market segment. Its contribution to the smartphone market was primarily in expanding access to 4G technology at a lower price point. Its lasting impact is less pronounced, as it didn’t introduce groundbreaking features or design elements that significantly influenced subsequent Samsung phone designs.

It represents a stepping stone in the evolution of affordable smartphones, highlighting the increasing accessibility of 4G technology.

The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275 specification sheet reveals a budget-friendly device with modest specs. However, comparing its capabilities to a higher-end model like the samsung galaxy a9 clone specification highlights the significant advancements in smartphone technology over time. Returning to the Ace 3, its compact size and affordability remain attractive features for users seeking a basic, reliable phone.

FAQ Insights

Was the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275 water resistant?

No, the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 LTE S7275 did not offer any water resistance features.

Did it support expandable storage?

Yes, it typically included a microSD card slot for expandable storage.

What was the battery’s removable status?

The battery was removable, a common feature in smartphones of that era.

How well did it handle multitasking?

Multitasking capabilities were limited due to its RAM and processor, leading to occasional lag with multiple apps running simultaneously.